<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Leadership Consultants - The Change Experts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leadershipconsultants.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leadershipconsultants.co.uk</link>
	<description>Leadership Consultants is the blog from the andpartnership. Find out more about us at http://www.andpartnership.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 06:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Team development – having real conversations by Guy Farmer</title>
		<link>http://leadershipconsultants.co.uk/2010/07/06/team-development-%e2%80%93-having-real-conversations/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy Farmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 06:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadershipconsultants.co.uk/?p=159#comment-31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very interesting question.  I&#039;ve found that the more trust we build the more likely people are to actually share on a deeper level.  It does require moving past the standard answers to helping people reflect on their own thoughts and behaviors and develop insights on doing things differently.  That dynamic is more likely to happen if they have connected with the facilitator and their team mates.  You can really tell when a group has crossed that threshold because the room will feel differently and people will talk more from the heart rather than parrot what they think people want to hear.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very interesting question.  I&#8217;ve found that the more trust we build the more likely people are to actually share on a deeper level.  It does require moving past the standard answers to helping people reflect on their own thoughts and behaviors and develop insights on doing things differently.  That dynamic is more likely to happen if they have connected with the facilitator and their team mates.  You can really tell when a group has crossed that threshold because the room will feel differently and people will talk more from the heart rather than parrot what they think people want to hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Training vs Facilitating by Guy Farmer</title>
		<link>http://leadershipconsultants.co.uk/2010/07/14/training-vs-facilitating/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy Farmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://andpartnership.wordpress.com/?p=178#comment-23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great insights.  I&#039;ve found that presentations are about the participants and what they are able to internalize.  A facilitator ideally gets out of the way and lets people internalize ideas and find ways to apply them to their lives.  It&#039;s even better if participants generate their own ideas and solutions and perhaps think critically along the way.  The more any meeting is run by the participants the better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great insights.  I&#8217;ve found that presentations are about the participants and what they are able to internalize.  A facilitator ideally gets out of the way and lets people internalize ideas and find ways to apply them to their lives.  It&#8217;s even better if participants generate their own ideas and solutions and perhaps think critically along the way.  The more any meeting is run by the participants the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Team development – having real conversations by StevenJBarker</title>
		<link>http://leadershipconsultants.co.uk/2010/07/06/team-development-%e2%80%93-having-real-conversations/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StevenJBarker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 05:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadershipconsultants.co.uk/?p=159#comment-19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a real trust barrier that must be broken through here. As you said it takes someone &quot;calling it as it is&quot;, but what is equally as important is the reaction to that honesty. The moments following are the &quot;moments of truth.&quot; How the perceived leaders of the room react, set the tone for the future. Those moments decide wether or not the team continues business as usual or if real change is on it&#039;s way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a real trust barrier that must be broken through here. As you said it takes someone &#8220;calling it as it is&#8221;, but what is equally as important is the reaction to that honesty. The moments following are the &#8220;moments of truth.&#8221; How the perceived leaders of the room react, set the tone for the future. Those moments decide wether or not the team continues business as usual or if real change is on it&#8217;s way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Engagement &#8211; not as obvious as you&#8217;d think! by Andrew Kerry</title>
		<link>http://leadershipconsultants.co.uk/2010/06/06/engagement-not-as-obvious-as-youd-think/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Kerry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadershipconsultants.co.uk/?p=111#comment-15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the engagement debate... It seems that people think engagement is something that is done to people not about doing things with people. My living nightmare are &#039;engagement strategies and plans&#039;. Why is it so hard to talk to people but so easy to write worthy documents and make presentations, develop models and all that corporate stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the engagement debate&#8230; It seems that people think engagement is something that is done to people not about doing things with people. My living nightmare are &#8216;engagement strategies and plans&#8217;. Why is it so hard to talk to people but so easy to write worthy documents and make presentations, develop models and all that corporate stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

