Posted by: Leadership Consultants | May 3, 2012

What Role Does Coaching Play in Empowerment?

The word ‘Coaching’ has taken on a number of meanings over the last few years, showing up in different places on the directive/questioning scale. Some people use it as a phrase to describe how they impart their solutions to others, (otherwise known as ‘guess my list’ or training) some use it as a performance verb (i.e. to give someone a good coaching) and some use it as a development tool, where people work out the answers for themselves. Part of the reason for this lies in the confusion behind the role of a coach – most sports coaches for example are incredibly directive when advising how an athlete can improve their performance.

The one thing that most people agree on is that you need to get a person to own their performance, to enable them to want to improve and find ways to make this happen. If they don’t own it, the best you can hope for is Willing Compliance. Often they will do as they are told while you are there telling them – as soon as you aren’t there they revert back. So the question is how do you get people to own performance? If Coaching has many meanings, Empowerment is running close behind. It is often used to describe the act of passing responsibility to others, in order to blame them if it doesn’t go as planned – it is also used to abdicate responsibility and sometimes ‘psuedo empowerent’ results in the power being given away and taken back at the first sign of trouble.

I believe the answer lies in linking the art of non-directive Coaching with the genuine desire to Empower. By being clear on the ‘What’ and then coaching (questioning with no solution in mind) on the ‘How’, you allow individuals to come up with their own way of achieving things, whilst being clear on the outcome required. By asking questions you allow individuals to think things through for themselves and make their own mistakes, which is how most of us have learnt over the years. Only by using these techniques will you get people to own their performance, care about the performance of the department/business they work for and feel that they can make a difference. This is the key to getting better performance today and growing leaders for tomorrow.

If you want to know more about how you can empower your people to deliver superior performance, why not come on our award-winning Coaching for Empowerment programme being held in London 26th and 27th June 2012? Contact becky.hedley@andpartnership.com for more details.

Posted by: Leadership Consultants | November 10, 2011

Can you Teach Presence?

We all know presence when we see it. Sometimes it is a tall, well-built person who everyone says ‘he/she has charisma – you know when they walk in a room’. Often it is a smaller person who quietly engages people through their rapport and relationship building. However they do it, they are able to command attention, people follow them and they get things done. The question a client asked me was ‘can you teach someone presence?’ They had a member of their team who was quiet and reflective, didn’t participate equally at meetings and had problems getting their voice heard. He was well liked, good at his job and always came up with well thought through arguments after reflection.

 My experience is that the energy we bring to our leadership is partly personality and partly learned. There are some natural leaders who find it easy to get and keep others attention and there are many more who work at it over a lifetime. What we often mean when we define presence is the Physical Energy that they bring, in their posture, gestures, voice and movement. But equally important is the Emotional Energy – showing empathy, really listening, making people feel important. Princess Diana was fairly quiet and unassuming but definitely had presence, through her emotional connection with people.

 To improve presence you have to understand firstly how you come across to others, through specific and honest feedback. You then need to decide what you want to do differently and what different impact you want to have. Through personal coaching you can then explore any limiting beliefs that you hold that are holding you back from making a change. There may finally be some new skills to learn or it may just be about consciously practicing ‘adjusting the dials’, turning up different leadership energy and turning down the voices in our head that stop us from being at our best. You then need ongoing feedback to reinforce positive changes and identify specific areas for continued improvement. What is most important is that you don’t try to be someone else, but that you understand your unique qualities and style and grow those to be the most effective you can be.

If you want to improve your presence or that of your leaders, contact David Tomkinson on 07710 003029 or e-mail david.tomkinson@andpartnership.com

Posted by: Leadership Consultants | October 25, 2011

National Training Awards 2011

 
 
We are delighted to announce our second National Training Award,  presented for the collaborative work between Virgin Trains and the andpartnership. The project, entitled ‘Introducing a Coaching Culture at Virgin Trains’ “demonstrated both outstanding and exceptional business achievements and organisational development made through training.”

Winner – National Training Awards 2011— West Midlands Macro Employer Category, With Virgin Trains.

Winner – National Training Awards 2009— Greater London, Partnership & Collaboration Category, With QBE Insurance.

Posted by: Leadership Consultants | October 17, 2011

Reluctant Leadership

I have often been struck by the amount of leaders that seem to get into a senior role and then spend a large percentage of their time doing their old job or the jobs of their team. My experience is that this is often because they are no longer being asked to do what they enjoy, what they are passionate about or what they perceive themselves to be good at.  A good sales person will be promoted to sales manager and suddenly won’t be selling any more, but managing others who are. No wonder then, without development and awareness, that they jump back into their teams day to day world at every opportunity. When they say ‘I could do this better’ they are probably right! Unfortunately getting down into the detail disempowers people, encourages abdication and affects the enjoyment of the Individuals.

Of course there are some leaders who naturally love strategy and ‘big picture’  and their problem is different – keeping themselves engaged and performing whilst in junior roles that require more detailed involvement! However for the majority of junior and middle managers climbing the ‘greasy pole’ is quite stressful, as they struggle to get clear on what is their role, what they should be delegating and to let go of what they love.

The answer seems to lay in greater self-awareness, having ‘big conversations’ and getting in touch with what they care about. If they are clear on what they are trying to create then it makes it easier to make great decisions, they are more comfortable with their role and purpose and they find new enthusiasm in leading a team to deliver their passion. By enabling open and honest conversations to take place, leaders become more self aware and team members can give them feedback when they do inadvertently ‘meddle’ in their work! 

I saw this recently in my interactions with a Managing Director of a large blue chip company. He was driving his team mad by getting involved in solving problems every time they occurred. As a result all leaders were leading at the level below where they should. Also he said to me ‘I don’t do visions’ and struggled to focus on the future rather than the short term. There was a feeling of disengagement throughout the business, and a feeling of not being trusted to do your job. 

I worked with the senior team to surface these feelings and got them to have powerful conversations about their frustrations. We then worked on the Future he wanted to create, what he was passionate about and what he was leading for. He was able to articulate this once he let go of the limiting belief that he ‘didn’t  do visions’. We were then able to engage all the senior leaders in what they were passionate about and how their part of the business can help deliver this future. They were then able to talk to their people in a different way, getting people excited about the future rather than overly focussing on the present. We also got them to identify their limiting beliefs and turn the volume down on these, to allow the more positive voices to be heard. 

 We helped leaders to develop Coaching skills, to avoid the temptation to jump back in, and undertook regular away days with the leadership team to review progress, identify what still needed to be done and help them to form new habits rather than reverting back to old behaviours. As a result, business performance is now at a record high and employee engagement has increased dramatically. Most importantly, the MD is now enjoying his role in shaping the future and leaving the problem fixing to those who have the remit to do so!

If you are looking to release the Reluctant Leadership within your business, call David Tomkinson on 07710 003029 or e-mail at david.tomkinson@andpartnership.com

Posted by: Leadership Consultants | September 7, 2011

The Myth of Consistency

by David Tomkinson

One of the biggest demands of organisations is for consistency of delivery. They go to extraordinary lengths to set the standards, measure the behaviours and tell staff how far away they are from being ‘competent’. My experience is that they are focussing on the wrong things – they tend to be trying to control inputs rather than measure outputs.

 

Let me give you an example – I was talking to a Marketing Director about a cultural change programme we were running for him to improve the customer experience. He started to ask me ‘when I go into a store, how will I know that the programme is working?’ My reply was ‘you ask the customers coming out of the store about their experience and you look at the sales figures’. This confused him – he was expecting the response that he would be approached within 30 seconds of entering the store or that he would hear staff reciting standard phrases to the customer. However if you focus on the outputs and let the staff determine how they get there, it is much more empowering for them and a lot less time consuming for the management. Otherwise it is trying to control something that isn’t controllable – people are different and they will only behave in a consistent, robotic way if constantly checked up on and punished for non compliance. Hardly the recipe for a happy, empowered workforce.!

 

Why do we recruit staff with individual personalities and then spend considerable amounts of time and money trying to get them to all be the same? Far better to reward and punish achievement of outputs and let the staff determine how to get there. Of course this requires other skills from management – coaching, feedback, listening, identifying training needs, providing support, to name but a few. However the rewards when you get this right are phenomenal – the Marketing Director above saw a 20% increase in sales and customer satisfaction almost doubling. Not surprisingly we didn’t have many conversations about inputs after this!  If you want to genuinely empower your organisation, contact david.tomkinson@andpartnership.com or visit our website www.andpartnership.com

Posted by: Leadership Consultants | August 19, 2011

Making Change Stick – The Moustache under your Nose!

By David Tomkinson

As the pace of change gets ever faster, organisations are constantly searching for the Holy Grail of sustainability. They push harder and quicker, put more pressure on their staff and very often end up losing the morale, or worse still, the best people leave. It strikes me that the answer, like a moustache, might be right under their nose, if they would only take the time to think and plan like they do for so many other things in business.

The main reason that change fails to stick is that the people kill it – not deliberately but just through lack of engagement. At the first opportunity they return to what they know or work around the new system to get what they want or what they had before. Humans are complex but at the same time simple creatures, who like and need routine. They have two basic needs at work (and some would say out of work as well) – to feel valued and to feel in control. When change happens, it often threatens both of these at the same time. The key to sustainability is focussing on these and letting the people sustain it for you.

One client I worked with recently was making major redundancies to enable the business to become competitive. We worked with them to plan how people were going to react/feel before, during and after the changes. We prepared the leaders for the change, ran workshops for staff going into the change and delivered recovery/rebuild sessions once the restructure had been implemented. One member of staff summed up how most of the people felt through this process; “this is the fourth major change I have been through with my organisation and this is the first time I have felt as if they care how I feel and that I have something to contribute. As a result our new team is stronger than before and is already working together more effectively than the old team”

To find out more about Sustaining Change, why not attend our free annual seminar on 8th September. More details of this and other work we have done in this field are at www.andpartnership.com

Posted by: Leadership Consultants | April 10, 2011

Changing cultures – playing with fire

I was working with an organisation recently that had a very structured plan for how they wanted to implement culture change and were working methodically through it.

What I noticed was that nothing was actually changing as they went through it.

All the boxes on the project plan were being ticked but the changes in behaviour they wanted to happen weren’t taking effect.

At the same time there were some senior leaders getting very engaged in the change and wanting to roll it out to their teams before their ‘turn’ on the plan, and were being told they couldn’t by the HR team – ‘we need to use our resources effectively and we have spent time planning the best order to do this in’. As a result leaders were either forced to ‘do their own thing’ which potentially derails consistent change, or they lost energy and focus as their attention switched to something else.

Change is messy and doesn’t happen in neat, packaged plans. People change behaviour at different speeds, with different motivations and ploughing on through a project plan just to say you have completed it won’t get you the change you seek.

Working with the energy, wherever it emerges, is far easier than trying to create it in a structured way. Working with people’s passions will always have a greater effect.

I have noticed that if you ‘light fires’ throughout an organisation, wherever leaders have the energy to change, eventually these fires join up naturally, creating a ‘bonfire of change’. It is messy, organic, exciting and can achieve step change more quickly than over planning and trying to force people to engage in something they don’t see as important.

If you are interested in trying a different approach to change that actually works contact david.tomkinson@andpartnership.com or call 0870 4050060

 

Posted by: Leadership Consultants | September 13, 2010

Knowing what to do and wanting to do it – Alignment and Engagement

by Alison Maxwell

I had the pleasure of hearing David MacLeod, co-author of the governmental report ‘ Engaging for Success: enhancing performance through employee engagement’ speak last week at the annual andpartnership seminar in London. David had spent more than a year researching the link between organisational performance and employee engagement and .. surprise, surprise the evidence is overwhelmingly in favour.  

David feels that ‘engagement’ is a much misunderstood (and maligned) term. He believes that employees need to be both aligned – they know what to do, and engaged – they want to do it. Alignment without engagement results in ‘tin soldiers’ following the letter but not the spirit. Engagement without alignment results in ‘headless chickens’ enthusiastically rushing around but creating mayhem.

So… what are the people in your organisation like. Aligned and engaged or neither?

A copy of the full report can be found by clicking here

Posted by: Leadership Consultants | August 1, 2010

Olympian Ambition

by Alison Maxwell

I had the great pleasure of meeting Dr David Hemery – Olympic Gold Medallist in the 400m hurdles, vice-chair of the British Olympic Association and co-founder of ’21st Century Legacy’. David’s ambition is disarmingly simple – he wants to connect kids to their dreams and passions and inspire them to be the best they can be. He’s taking a coaching programme into secondary schools up and down the country and seeing disaffected teenagers ‘get’ perhaps for the first time that school is their to help them realise their ambitions and not just for the benefit of the teachers and the league tables.

I found David deeply inspiring and was struck by how his simple yet compelling vision of how things could be connected with everyone listening to him. Not original I know, but the power of a leader with an inspiring vision is inestimable.

So.. when did you last show up in a way that inspired others? What is your disarmingly simple vision of how things could be?

For more information on the 21st Legacy Programme visit the website by clicking here

Posted by: Leadership Consultants | July 14, 2010

Training vs Facilitating

By Alison Maxwell

I’m intrigued by the ‘journey ‘ (sorry about the cliche) that trainers go on to become facilitators . I’ve recently been working with an HR team to help them up to facilitate some organisation-wide change sessions . What was curious was how the ‘trainers’ had a much tougher time adopting a facilitative style and insisted on 1) filling every moment , 2) nannying, entertaining or pleasing the group , 3) clinging to their notes for grim death or 4) forgetting to track where the group were ‘at’ and adapting accordingly . The idea that they were there to help the group have the conversation it needed to have without preconceived outcomes was a novelty to say the least. Their colleagues from the more transactional end of HR grasped this concept far quicker and didn’t need to do the degree of ‘unlearning’ that their apparently better qualified / experienced peers needed and struggled to do .

So … Who holds responsibility when you facilitate ? You or the group ?

Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,232 other followers